From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Villegas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC)

04-27-2023

JERRY LEE KING, Plaintiff, v. R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENSE COUNSEL TO CONTACT ADR COORDINATOR WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS TO SCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

On April 26, 2023, the Court denied Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 118). Additionally, the dispositive motion deadline has passed, and no other dispositive motions have been filed. Accordingly, the Court will require the parties to participate in a second settlement conference before the case proceeds further. If the case does not settle, the Court will issue an additional scheduling order for the deadlines to proceed to trial.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defense counsel has fourteen days from the date of service of this order to contact ADR Coordinator Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov) to schedule a second settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Villegas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)
Case details for

King v. Villegas

Case Details

Full title:JERRY LEE KING, Plaintiff, v. R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 27, 2023

Citations

1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)