From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Unknown Defendants

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
May 30, 2024
Civil Action 9:23-CV-74 (E.D. Tex. May. 30, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:23-CV-74

05-30-2024

DAVID KING, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff David King, Jr., an inmate confined at the Wainwright Unit, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends denying plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

The magistrate judge's recommendation was based on plaintiff's statement, made under the penalty of perjury, that he owns a United States bond valued at $100,000,000.00 and he receives $100.00 per month from friends and family. In his objections, plaintiff states the prison is not allowing him to receive promissory note paper. Plaintiff, however, remains responsible for making arrangements for paying the filing fee, not the court. Therefore, after careful consideration of all the pleadings and the relevant case law, the court concludes that plaintiff's objections lack merit.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is

ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (#4) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $405.00 within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

King v. Unknown Defendants

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
May 30, 2024
Civil Action 9:23-CV-74 (E.D. Tex. May. 30, 2024)
Case details for

King v. Unknown Defendants

Case Details

Full title:DAVID KING, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 9:23-CV-74 (E.D. Tex. May. 30, 2024)