Opinion
No. 05-06-00363-CR.
Opinion issued January 29, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-54482-TR.
Before Justices WRIGHT, BRIDGES, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gerry Lee King pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and true to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court deferred adjudicating appellant's guilt and placed him on ten years' community supervision. The State later moved to proceed with adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant violated the conditions of community supervision. Following a hearing, the trial court found the allegations true, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment at thirty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.