From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 30, 2002
564 S.E.2d 815 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

A02A0101.

DECIDED: APRIL 30, 2002

Aggravated battery. Ben Hill Superior Court. Before Judge Forrestor.

David E. Morgan III, for appellant.

Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, Cheri L. Nichols, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


A jury found Willie King guilty of aggravated battery for rendering both of the victim's legs useless by slamming her on the floor. On appeal King urges the general grounds. We affirm.

On appeal we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury's verdict and determine whether the evidence is sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find King guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Ahmadi v. State, 251 Ga. App. 189 ( 554 S.E.2d 215) (2001); see Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979). Viewed in this light, the evidence showed King, upset that the victim had earlier called police, picked the victim up over his shoulder and threw her on her neck, causing paralysis in the victim's legs.

"A person commits the offense of aggravated battery when he or she maliciously causes bodily harm to another by depriving him or her of a member of his or her body, by rendering a member of his or her body useless, or by seriously disfiguring his or her body or a member thereof." OCGA § 16-5-24 (a). Although King testified the victim's injury occurred when she tripped over a cord and fell while trying to run from him, "[i]t is the function of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses and to weigh and resolve any conflicts in the testimony." Blackman v. State, 178 Ga. App. 88, 89 (1) ( 342 S.E.2d 24) (1986). As long as there is some competent evidence, even if contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State's case, the jury's verdict will be upheld. Daniels v. State, 249 Ga. App. 593 ( 548 S.E.2d 108) (2001).

The victim's testimony that King caused her bodily harm by slamming her on the floor and rendering her legs useless was sufficient to sustain King's conviction. See White v. State, 210 Ga. App. 563, 564 ( 436 S.E.2d 584) (1993); Blackman, supra, 178 Ga. App. at 89 (1).

Judgment affirmed. BLACKBURN, C. J., and JOHNSON, P.J., concur.


DECIDED APRIL 30, 2002.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 30, 2002
564 S.E.2d 815 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:KING v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 30, 2002

Citations

564 S.E.2d 815 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
564 S.E.2d 815

Citing Cases

Stokes v. State

Andrews, P.J., and Mikell, J., concur. See King v. State, 255 Ga. App. 191 ( 564 S.E.2d 815) (2002). PHIPPS,…

McKee v. State

Such is sufficient to enable a jury to conclude that McKee was guilty of the charged offenses. Wolf v. State,…