From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Ratledge

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2015
598 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-7837

03-20-2015

DANIEL H. KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Respondent - Appellee.

Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02038-FL) Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel H. King, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02038-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

King v. Ratledge

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2015
598 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

King v. Ratledge

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL H. KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

598 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2015)