From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1916
162 P. 821 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 7711

Opinion Filed December 19, 1916. Rehearing Denied January 30, 1917.

Error from District Court, Haskell County; W.H. Brown, Judge.

Action between Rachel King and others and N.W. Palmer and others. There was judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Reversed and remanded.

G.A. Holley and E.D. Means, for plaintiffs in error.

A.L. Beckett and J.E. Whitehead, for defendants in error.


Where the plaintiffs in error have briefed their cause, and the defendants in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for a failure so to do, and the extension of time allowed them in which to file brief has expired, and the brief of plaintiffs in error indicates that there are errors in the record, and the authorities therein cited, seem to support their contention, the cause will be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

King v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 19, 1916
162 P. 821 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

King v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:KING et al. v. PALMER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 19, 1916

Citations

162 P. 821 (Okla. 1916)
162 P. 821