From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. McFadden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 27, 2020
No. 20-6062 (4th Cir. May. 27, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6062

05-27-2020

ANDRE KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN MCFADDEN, Respondent - Appellee.

Andre King, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00091-JMC) Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andre King appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to extend or reopen the period to note an appeal from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Warden McFadden, No. 1:14-cv-00091-JMC (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

King v. McFadden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 27, 2020
No. 20-6062 (4th Cir. May. 27, 2020)
Case details for

King v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN MCFADDEN, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 27, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6062 (4th Cir. May. 27, 2020)