From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Marriott Intern

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 29, 2008
267 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1880.

Submitted: February 11, 2008.

Decided: February 29, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:05-cv-01774-PMD).

Terry S. King, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Montgomery Shetterly, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Terry King appeals the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant summary judgment to Marriott International, Inc. on King's claim of retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621- 634 (2000), and on King's state law contract claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2007), 520 F.Supp.2d 744 (D.S.C. 2007), and 520 F.Supp.2d 748 (D.S.C. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

King v. Marriott Intern

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 29, 2008
267 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

King v. Marriott Intern

Case Details

Full title:Terry S. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Weaver v. John Lucas Tree Expert Co.

Under the doctrine of at-will employment, an "at-will employee may be terminated at any time for any reason…

Washington v. The Boeing Co.

This Court has long held that such statements are insufficient to overcome the presumption of at-will…