From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. MaCay

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2023
3:21-cv-08309-TLT (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-08309-TLT (PR)

09-20-2023

RASHAD LAMAR KING, Plaintiff, v. E. MACAY, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

HONORABLE TRINA L. THOMPSON, JUDGE

Plaintiff Rashad Lamar King and Defendants Tange (Avina) and Macay (collectively, the parties) have resolved this case in its entirety. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees.


Summaries of

King v. MaCay

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2023
3:21-cv-08309-TLT (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)
Case details for

King v. MaCay

Case Details

Full title:RASHAD LAMAR KING, Plaintiff, v. E. MACAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-08309-TLT (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)