Opinion
21-6561
02-07-2022
TIMOTHY ROYAL KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIK A. HOOKS; W. DAVID GUICE; CYNTHIA THORNTON; MELANIE SHELTON; KENNETH LASSITER; BETTY BROWN; SUSAN ADDAMS, Defendants - Appellees. and MICHAEL BLANKEY; DERICK WHITE; DAYVON D. PERSON; LARRY FULLER; TIMOTHY BOYD; CHRIS PEARSALL; JIMMY TINSLEY; RONALD BLAIR WINSTEAD; GREGORY PORTER; CORTNEY LEACH; MILTON L. LAWRENCE; JOHN MCNEILL; XAVIER KINNEY; IRVIN VASQUEZ; DONALD USEVICH, Plaintiffs,
Timothy Royal King, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: January 25, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03043-FL)
Timothy Royal King, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Royal King appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment on his civil rights complaint in which he raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Hooks, No. 5:17-ct-03043-FL (E.D. N.C. Mar. 31, 2020; Mar. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.