From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Hampton

Court of Errors and Appeals, Rogersville
Nov 1, 1816
4 Tenn. 59 (Tenn. 1816)

Opinion

November Term, 1816.

The Supreme Court, having no original jurisdiction, can not award a mandamus to compel the Circuit Court to proceed with the trial of a cause; but will aid an appeal by any writ which will remove the impediment. (Acc. State, c., v. Hall, 3 Cold., 262, citing this case; 9 H., 236. And see Kennedy v. Woolfolk, 1 Tenn., 453.)

[Cited in: 3 Bax., 80; 6 Bax., 7, 8; 2 Lea, 279; 8 Lea, 561; 12 Lea, 93; 21 Pickle, 723.]


This is a petition exhibited to this court for a mandamus to compel the Circuit Court to proceed to the trial of the cause between these parties, having been moved into the Circuit Court by appeal to the Circuit Court, having been continued by the judge for two years and a half under an act of the legislature, being, as he supposed, an action for a gun impressed for the public service in the time of the late war.

This court has no original jurisdiction, and can not take cognizance of any matter unless it relates to an appeal, which if prayed and defeated, or attempted to be defeated in any way, this court would aid by any writ which would overcome and remove the injury.

Petition dismissed.

NOTE. — The act referred to in this case is the Act of 1815, 36, 3, 4, which provides that if the United States do not, within two years, pay for arms impressed in the war of 1812, this State will, and suspends all proceedings against officers for impressing arms for two years. — ED.


Summaries of

King v. Hampton

Court of Errors and Appeals, Rogersville
Nov 1, 1816
4 Tenn. 59 (Tenn. 1816)
Case details for

King v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS KING v. JOHN HAMPTON

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals, Rogersville

Date published: Nov 1, 1816

Citations

4 Tenn. 59 (Tenn. 1816)