From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 26, 2021
CIVIL 21-1191(DSD/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 21-1191(DSD/TNL)

07-26-2021

Clement David King, Plaintiff, v. Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G.; Michael Carvajal, Dir. Of Bur. of Prisons; S. Kallis, Warden, FMC Rochester; Chad Orum, Work Cadre Unit Manager, FMC Rochester; Dr. M. Klein, Chief of Psychology, FMC Rochester; Dr. Lucas, Psychologist, FMC Rochester; J. Nerstad, Former Correctional Systems Specialist, FMC Rochester; and Lt. Gilbertson, Property Lieutenant, FMC Rochester, Defendants.


ORDER

DAVID S. DOTY, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Tony N. Leung dated June 30, 2021. Neither party has filed objections to the R&R in the time period permitted. Based on the R&R and the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The report and recommendation [ECF No. 11] is adopted in its entirety; and

2. Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction [ECF Nos. 3, 7, 9] are denied as moot.


Summaries of

King v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 26, 2021
CIVIL 21-1191(DSD/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

King v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:Clement David King, Plaintiff, v. Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G.; Michael…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 21-1191(DSD/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 26, 2021)