From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Farah & Farah, P.A.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 18, 2021
316 So. 3d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-0515

05-18-2021

Terrell KING, Petitioner, v. FARAH & FARAH, P.A., Eddie E. Farah, and Charlie E. Farah, Respondents.

Carlos R. Diez-Arguelles of Diez-Arguelles & Tejedor, Orlando, for Petitioner. Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Respondents.


Carlos R. Diez-Arguelles of Diez-Arguelles & Tejedor, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Osterhaus, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

King v. Farah & Farah, P.A.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 18, 2021
316 So. 3d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

King v. Farah & Farah, P.A.

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL KING, Petitioner, v. FARAH & FARAH, P.A., EDDIE E. FARAH, and…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 18, 2021

Citations

316 So. 3d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)