From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Douglas Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 14, 2019
8:19CV63 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2019)

Summary

In King v. Douglas County, 114 Neb. 477, 208 N.W. 120, this court determined that the duty to maintain a highway extended outside the traveled portion of the highway.

Summary of this case from Richardson Gillispie v. State

Opinion

8:19CV63

02-14-2019

MABEL KING, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA, AFLAC, and EEOC, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Mabel King, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Filing No. 2.) Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the court finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 14th day of February, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

King v. Douglas Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 14, 2019
8:19CV63 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2019)

In King v. Douglas County, 114 Neb. 477, 208 N.W. 120, this court determined that the duty to maintain a highway extended outside the traveled portion of the highway.

Summary of this case from Richardson Gillispie v. State

In King v. Douglas County, 114 Neb. 477, 208 N.W. 120, it was held: "The presence of a well-traveled track, obviously in recent use, situated within the confines of a regularly established rural highway, and connecting with a public highway open to travel, with no barriers thereto, and no warning signs thereon, constitutes a continuing invitation to the traveling public to use the same, and justifies the assumption that those chargeable with its maintenance have performed their duties, and that the portion of the highway occupied by such traveled tracks is reasonably safe for the accommodation of the public."

Summary of this case from Kuska v. Nichols Construction Co.
Case details for

King v. Douglas Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MABEL KING, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA, AFLAC, and EEOC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Feb 14, 2019

Citations

8:19CV63 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2019)

Citing Cases

Richardson Gillispie v. State

Higgins v. Garfield County, 107 Neb. 482, 186 N.W. 347. In King v. Douglas County, 114 Neb. 477, 208 N.W.…

Kuska v. Nichols Construction Co.

Klaus v. Soloman Valley Stage Lines Co., 130 Neb. 325, 264 N.W. 747. In King v. Douglas County, 114 Neb. 477,…