From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King Sales Company, Inc. v. Buster

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 5, 1961
121 S.E.2d 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

38888.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1961.

Action for damages. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Camp.

Bruce B. Edwards, for plaintiff in error.

Bullock, Yancey Mitchell, Kyle Yancey, contra.


1. The defendant, plaintiff in error, has only argued the general demurrer filed to the petition of the plaintiffs, the defendants in error. Accordingly, no question for decision is presented by special demurrers, or by the motion to require the plaintiffs to redraft their petition.

2. The allegations of the petition in this case are very similar to the allegations of the petition dealt with in the second division of the opinion in the case of King Sales Co. v. McKey, 104 Ga. App. 63 ( 121 S.E.2d 48), except that in the case sub judice it was alleged: "Immediately upon the plaintiffs discovering that they had been deceived by the false representations as to cancer and ulcers, as hereinbefore alleged, the plaintiffs offered to return the stainless steel cook ware, but the defendants refused to accept the same, with the statement that even if it were returned, they would still have to pay for it." Under the decision in the second division of King Sales Co. v. McKey, 104 Ga. App. 63, 68, supra, the judgment overruling the defendant's general demurrer was not error. Judgment affirmed. Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1961.


Summaries of

King Sales Company, Inc. v. Buster

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 5, 1961
121 S.E.2d 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

King Sales Company, Inc. v. Buster

Case Details

Full title:KING SALES COMPANY, INC. v. BUSTER et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 5, 1961

Citations

121 S.E.2d 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961)
121 S.E.2d 682