From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King Kullen Grocery Co. v. Long Island Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint denied.

Special Term erred in dismissing the complaint as barred by the short Statute of Limitations applicable to tort actions pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1276 (2), (6). The liability alleged in the complaint has its genesis in the contractual relationship between the parties, and the plaintiff seeks to recover, for damage to property. Under the analysis articulated in Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Enco Assoc. ( 43 N.Y.2d 389) and Baratta v Kozlowski ( 94 A.D.2d 454), the six-year contract Statute of Limitations is applicable. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

King Kullen Grocery Co. v. Long Island Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

King Kullen Grocery Co. v. Long Island Railroad

Case Details

Full title:KING KULLEN GROCERY CO., INC., Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)