From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinford v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 4, 2013
3:11-cv-00701-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00701-RCJ-WGC

03-04-2013

STEVEN KINFORD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

This is a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The claims arise out of facial surgery performed by doctors under contract with the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC") or specially hired by NDOC for Plaintiff's procedure. On January 25, 2013, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice by stipulation against the only three Defendants remaining. Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider because he did not mean to dismiss as against Dr. Pincock. But Dr. Pincock has never been a defendant and leave was never granted to join him before dismissal.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 91) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kinford v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 4, 2013
3:11-cv-00701-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Kinford v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN KINFORD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00701-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Mar. 4, 2013)