From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kindle v. Vanderlande Indus.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 8, 2024
2:23-cv-09738-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-09738-DOC-SHK

07-08-2024

NDREW S. KINDLE, Plaintiff, v. VANDERLANDE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, Defendant Vanderlande Industries, Inc.'s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss, or, In The Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement (“MTD”), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Defendant's MTD is GRANTED; (2) the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend as to all claims, except Plaintiff's Occupational Safety and Health Act claim, which is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (3) Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint within 21 -days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Kindle v. Vanderlande Indus.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 8, 2024
2:23-cv-09738-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Kindle v. Vanderlande Indus.

Case Details

Full title:NDREW S. KINDLE, Plaintiff, v. VANDERLANDE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-09738-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024)