From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
328 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-3690

09-22-2021

John KIMBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

John Kimble, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


John Kimble, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

John Kimble appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that the trial court imposed a vindictive sentence when he was resentenced pursuant to a successful motion to correct sentencing error. Because the postconviction court properly determined that a vindictive sentencing claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a), we affirm. See Jackson v. State , 193 So. 3d 1, 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Bouno v. State , 900 So. 2d 672, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; Taylor v. State , 897 So. 2d 495, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; Boyd v. State , 880 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED .

Ray, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kimble v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
328 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Kimble v. State

Case Details

Full title:John KIMBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

328 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)