From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Prudential Milk Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

October, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.


Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. The question of errors in the charge, now raised, was not presented to this court either in the briefs or on the argument of the appeal.


Summaries of

Kimble v. Prudential Milk Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Kimble v. Prudential Milk Company

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR H. KIMBLE, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL MILK COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)