From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimball v. Culclager

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2021
4:21-CV-348-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

4:21-CV-348-LPR-BD

06-28-2021

TOMMY J. KIMBALL, ADC# 164543 v. ANDREA CULCLAGER, et al. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has received a Recommendation for the dismissal of some Defendants. Mr. Kimball has not filed objections, and the time to do so has expired. After a careful and de novo review of the Recommendation and the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects.

In addition, the Court notes that the Complaint failed to allege any facts that would support the failure-to-train claim that appears in conclusory fashion at paragraph 26 of the Complaint. Without any such facts, the Complaint does not state a viable failure-to-train claim.

Mr. Kimball's claims against Defendants Culclager, Andrews, Daniels, Starks, Wade, and Branham are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to terminate those individuals as party Defendants.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kimball v. Culclager

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2021
4:21-CV-348-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Kimball v. Culclager

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY J. KIMBALL, ADC# 164543 v. ANDREA CULCLAGER, et al. PLAINTIFF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

4:21-CV-348-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)