From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 11, 2011
416 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-1737.

Submitted: January 26, 2011.

Decided: March 11, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-02973-DKC).

Eun S. Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Eun S. Kim appeals the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(l). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Potter, No. 8:09-cv-02973-DKC, 2010 WL 2253656 (D. Md. June 2, 2010). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kim v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 11, 2011
416 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Kim v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:Eun S. KIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack POTTER, PMG/CEO, U.S. Postal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2011

Citations

416 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Bd. of Educ. of Calvert Cnty.

"Failure by the employee to exhaust administrative remedies . . . deprives the federal courts of subject…

Sillah v. Burwell

Lewis v. MV Transp., Inc. , 2012 WL 4518541, at *3 (D. Md. Sept. 28, 2012) ("Under the ADA, the exhaustion…