From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Galasso

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2023
No. SC2022-1608 (Fla. Jul. 12, 2023)

Opinion

SC2022-1608

07-12-2023

Lee Te Kim, Petitioner(s) v. Courtney Galasso, et al., Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2D20-3313 292019CA002609A001HC

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it should decline to accept jurisdiction, it is ordered that the petition for review is denied.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

The motion for attorney's fees are granted and it is ordered that respondents AGP Ruskin, LLC and Robert Pittman, Jr. shall recover from petitioner the amount of $2,500.00 for the services of respondent's attorney in this Court.

Respondent's AGP Ruskin, LLC and Robert Pittman, Jr.motion for attorney's fees against Courtney Galasso is hereby denied.

The motion for attorney's fees are granted and it is ordered that respondent Courtney Galasso, shall recover from petitioner the amount of $2,500.00 for the services of respondent's attorney in this Court.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kim v. Galasso

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2023
No. SC2022-1608 (Fla. Jul. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Kim v. Galasso

Case Details

Full title:Lee Te Kim, Petitioner(s) v. Courtney Galasso, et al., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 12, 2023

Citations

No. SC2022-1608 (Fla. Jul. 12, 2023)