From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Berg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
20 Civ. 3344 (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 3344 (GWG)

12-01-2021

YONG SUNG KIM Plaintiff, v. PAL BERG et al., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 1, 2020, an order was issued on the parties' consent agreeing to disposition of this matter by the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By letter dated November 30, 2021, the parties have reported to the Court that they have reached a settlement of this matter.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs (including attorney's fees) to either party. If either party wishes to reinstate this matter, the party must make a letter application to the undersigned before the 60-day period expires seeking to re-open this matter. Any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely for failure to meet the 60-day deadline.

Any pending motions are moot. The Clerk is requested to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kim v. Berg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
20 Civ. 3344 (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Kim v. Berg

Case Details

Full title:YONG SUNG KIM Plaintiff, v. PAL BERG et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 3344 (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)