Kilpatrick v. Hartley

Full title: LARRY NEAL KILPATRICK, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

EDCV 09-1410-JFW (OP) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2010)

Opinion

LARRY NEAL KILPATRICK, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 09-1410-JFW (OP). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 5, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, de novo. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) approving and adopting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.