From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Killinger v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 2, 2011
No. CV 11-1270-PHX-GMS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 11-1270-PHX-GMS (ECV).

September 2, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff Thomas J. Killinger and four other inmates, who are confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Yuma, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an June 27, 2011 Order, the Court the severed the action into individual cases. See Doc. 11 in CIV 11-934-PHX-GMS (ECV). On July 11, 2011, the Court issued an Order requiring Plaintiff to pay the $350.00 civil action filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

On August 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a "Motion for Release of Retention Funds" (Doc. 5).

I. Motion for Release of Retention Funds and Extension of Time

In his Motion, Plaintiff states that he intends to pay the filing fee in a lump sum, but that the release of his funds will take more than the 30 days Plaintiff was allotted by the Court's July 11th Order. Plaintiff asks that the Court order the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) to release funds from Plaintiff's retention account for payment of the filing fee. Plaintiff also requests that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to pay the fee by 30 to 60 days.

The Court will not issue an Order to ADOC for payment of the filing fee from Plaintiff's account. However, the Court will grant Plaintiff an additional 30 days from the filing date of this Order to pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

II. Warnings

A. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

B. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Plaintiff.

C. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion for Release of Retention Funds (Doc. 5) is denied in part with respect to Plaintiff's request for a Court Order. The Motion is granted in part with respect to Plaintiff's request for additional time within which to pay the filing fee.

(2) Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement from the ADOC's Central Office.

(3) If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Killinger v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 2, 2011
No. CV 11-1270-PHX-GMS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Killinger v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Thomas J. Killinger Plaintiff, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-1270-PHX-GMS (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 2, 2011)