From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIERNAN v. HAFF

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1922
200 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

February, 1922.


Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment unanimously directed for the defendant, with costs. We think upon the evidence contained in the record that the maintenance of the barn in question and the toilet, for upwards of twenty-five years, with the acquiescence of plaintiffs' grantors constituted a practical location of the boundary line in dispute within the authorities. ( Katz v. Kaiser, 154 N.Y. 294; Ford v. Schlosser, 13 Misc. Rep. 205.) Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order and findings in accordance with this memorandum before Mr. Justice Young.


Summaries of

KIERNAN v. HAFF

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1922
200 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

KIERNAN v. HAFF

Case Details

Full title:FRANK A. KIERNAN and MILDRED W. KIERNAN, Respondents, v. STELLA B. HAFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1922

Citations

200 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)