From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kicklighter v. Jacksonville

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 10, 2008
978 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 1D07-1890.

April 10, 2008.

An appeal from the Judge of Compensation Claims. William Dane, Judge.

James H. Daniel and John J. Schickel of Coker, Schickel, Sorenson Daniel, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Richard Mullaney, General Counsel, and Michael J. Arington and Wendy L. Steiner, Assistant General Counsels, Jacksonville, for Appellee.


The record does not contain competent substantial evidence to support the Judge of Compensation Claims' (JCC) finding that claimant, Joseph Kicklighter, was able to engage in at least sedentary employment within a 50-mile radius of his residence. The JCC's determination that claimant was not entitled to permanent total disability (PTD) benefits was based on this finding. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the final compensation order denying claimant PTD benefits and remand with directions for the trial court to enter a new final order awarding claimant PTD benefits pursuant to section 440.15(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2004).

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kicklighter v. Jacksonville

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 10, 2008
978 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Kicklighter v. Jacksonville

Case Details

Full title:Joseph KICKLIGHTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 10, 2008

Citations

978 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)