From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khong v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2135 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2015)

Opinion


PHAT M. KHONG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-2135 TLN AC (PS) United States District Court, E.D. California. October 27, 2015

ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, proceeding in this action in pro per, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs have submitted an affidavit making the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.

The determination that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (screening of IFP complaints), the court is directed to dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant.

For screening purposes, the complaint appears to state a cognizable claim for relief under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (civil actions for refund of tax paid). If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), is GRANTED.

2. Under IRC 7422(f), this action may only be brought against the United States. Accordingly, pursuant to IRC 7422(f)(2), the United States is hereby SUBSTITUTED as defendant.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in civil cases.

4. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal, 501 "I" Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030.

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, including a copy of this court's scheduling order, without prepayment of costs.

6. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require at least:

a. One completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form;

c. One copy of the endorsed filed complaint, with an extra copy for the U.S. Marshal;

d. One copy of this court's scheduling order; and

e. One copy of the instant order.

7. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process (which here includes a copy of this court's scheduling order and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge), without prepayment of costs, not later than sixty days from the date of this order. Service of process shall be completed by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and by sending a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(i)(1)(A).

8. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effectuate service on any defendant within 60 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.

9. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Khong v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2135 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Khong v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PHAT M. KHONG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2135 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2015)