From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khodayari v. Mashburn

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Nov 22, 2011
No. B231779 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

B231779

11-22-2011

BAHMAN KHODAYARI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHARLES MASHBURN, Defendant and Respondent.


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC448748)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:*

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 15, 2011, be modified as follows:

1. On page 7, the second paragraph should be modified as follows:

"As we explain below, we conclude that (1) all appellant's causes of action are based on alleged legal malpractice resulting in appellant being found in violation of probation, which in turn caused the harm for which he seeks compensation -- his incarceration and the restitution payment his brother made on his behalf for which the brother now seeks repayment; (2) the policy rationale of the actual innocence requirement mandates that appellant show actual innocence of the probation violations, and obtain post-violation exoneration; (3) because appellant did not comply with these requirements, and has not shown that he can, the demurrer was properly sustained without leave to amend."

There is no change in the judgment.

WILLHITE, Acting P.J.

MANELLA, J.

SUZUKAWA, J.


Summaries of

Khodayari v. Mashburn

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Nov 22, 2011
No. B231779 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Khodayari v. Mashburn

Case Details

Full title:BAHMAN KHODAYARI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHARLES MASHBURN, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. B231779 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 22, 2011)