From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Stricklin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
24-cv-00717 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00717 BLF (PR)

02-09-2024

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. ROBIN STRICKLIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FULL FILING FEE (Docket No. 3)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 3. The motion is DENIED because Plaintiff has not shown an adequate level of poverty: the last statement balance from his trust account is $1,012.41. Id. at 3. Plaintiff must pay the $405.00 filing fee within twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed or face dismissal of this action for failure to pay the filing fee.

This order terminates Docket No. 3.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Khan v. Stricklin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
24-cv-00717 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Khan v. Stricklin

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. ROBIN STRICKLIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00717 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)