From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 8, 2024
20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-03086-BLF (PR)

04-08-2024

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Docket No. 84)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). On November 15, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 72.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a third extension of time to file opposition, citing religious holiday observances and pending discovery matters. Dkt. No. 84. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed no later than May 31, 2024. Defendants shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiff's opposition is due.

This order terminates Docket No. 84.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 8, 2024
20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Khan v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 8, 2024

Citations

20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)