From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Madsen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 2, 2024
23-cv-06141 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06141 BLF (PR)

07-02-2024

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. HALEY MADSEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 31)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various officers at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 5. On June 12, 2024, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 11) with leave to amend to correct various deficiencies within twenty-eight days from the order. Dkt. No. 30. Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time until August 7, 2024, citing his pending move from the facility and lack of access to his materials, including a typewriter. Dkt. No. 31. He asks the Court to “accommodate him with reasonable accommodations under the ADA and Rehab Act due to his pain and bodily limitations at this time.” Id. at 2.

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than August 7, 2024, as requested. As for his request for “reasonable accommodations,” Plaintiff should make such requests to the appropriate prison facility.

This order terminates Docket No. 31.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Khan v. Madsen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 2, 2024
23-cv-06141 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Khan v. Madsen

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. HALEY MADSEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06141 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)