From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Convention Overlook, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1998
253 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, that branch of the motion of American Home Assurance Company which was for summary judgment against the second third-party plaintiff Abilene, Inc., declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify Abilene, Inc., in this personal injury action is granted, that branch of the cross motion of Abilene, Inc., which was for summary judgment declaring that it is so obligated is denied, that branch of the motion of American Home Assurance Company which was for summary judgment dismissing the cross claims of the second third-party defendant Countrywide Facilities Corp. insofar as asserted against it is granted, the cross claims of Countrywide Facilities Corp. insofar as asserted against American Home Assurance Company are dismissed, the second third-party action as against the remaining second third-party defendants is severed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that American Home Assurance Company has no duty to defend or indemnify Abilene, Inc., in this personal injury action.

The plaintiff Yaqoob Khan was injured on October 24, 1990, while working at a construction project. He and his wife commenced this personal injury action in April 1993. A third-party action was commenced against Khan's employer, Abilene, Inc. (hereinafter Abilene), in November 1993. Abilene notified its insurance broker, Countrywide Facilities Corp. (hereinafter Countrywide), of the pending action, but Countrywide did not notify American Home Assurance Company (hereinafter American Home), Abilene's liability carrier. Abilene first notified American Home of the accident and pending action in March 1995. Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants in the main action ever provided notice to American Home.

On May 1, 1995, American Home disclaimed coverage based on Abilene's failure to provide timely notice of the occurrence as required by its insurance policy. The disclaimer was sent to Abilene, but not to the plaintiffs or the defendants. Abilene then commenced a second third-party action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that American Home was obligated to defend and indemnify it.

The requirement that an insured notify its carrier of a claim "as soon as practicable" is a condition precedent to coverage ( Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Fasciano, 212 A.D.2d 579, 580). Here, Abilene failed to provide timely notice to American Home and is therefore not entitled to a judgment declaring that American Home must defend or indemnify it ( see, Zadrima v. PSM Ins. Cos., 208 A.D.2d 529). The notice of disclaimer sufficiently specified the ground for disclaiming coverage ( see, Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co. v. Flood, 128 A.D.2d 683). Further, Abilene and Countrywide cannot rely upon American Home's failure to send its notice of disclaimer to the plaintiffs or the defendants as a basis for invalidating the disclaimer ( see, Batchie v. Travelers Ins. Co., 130 A.D.2d 536).

The respondents' contention regarding the timeliness of American Home's disclaimer may not be raised for the first time on appeal ( see, Matter of Matarrese v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 247 A.D.2d 475; Gross v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 240 A.D.2d 468).

Miller, J. P., Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Khan v. Convention Overlook, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1998
253 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Khan v. Convention Overlook, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:YAQOOB KHAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONVENTION OVERLOOK, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 377

Citing Cases

Pile Foundation Construction v. Investors Ins. Co.

We affirm. Contrary to Pile's contention, it cannot rely upon Investors' failure to send its notice of…

National Un. Fire Ins. Co. v. State Ins. FD

The Supreme Court properly rejected the contention of SIF that the National Union disclaimer of coverage for…