From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Key Largo Marina v. Sabin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 18, 2001
784 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D00-1647.

Opinion filed April 18, 2001.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Lower Tribunal No. 99-646. Raymond Hare, Senior Judge.

Broad and Cassell and Michael P. Bennett and M. Stephen Turner and Maura Bolivar and Gail I. Ferguson, for appellant.

David G. Hutchison, for appellees.

Before Gersten, Goderich and Shevin, JJ.


Key Largo Marina, Inc., the defendant-counterplaintiff in this action, appeals a final judgment. We reverse because the record demonstrates that there is no evidence to support the trial court's finding that the Sabins were third-party beneficiaries of the lease between Key Largo Marina, Inc., and Atlantic Coast Yacht Club, Inc. "Unless a contract is entered into for the direct and substantial benefit of a third party, it binds and benefits only the parties themselves. The intention of the contracting parties, gleaned from the contract itself, is determinative." City of Tampa v. Thornton-Tomasetti, P.C., 646 So.2d 279, 282-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Weimar v. Yacht Club Point Estates, Inc., 223 So.2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). There is nothing in the Key Largo-Atlantic Coast lease that even remotely references or mentions the Sabins or any interest the Sabins may have. There was absolutely no evidence to support the court's finding that the Sabins had a lifetime leasehold interest in either the houseboat or the slip where it was located. We therefore remand for further consistent proceedings.

The judgment is reversed.


Summaries of

Key Largo Marina v. Sabin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 18, 2001
784 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Key Largo Marina v. Sabin

Case Details

Full title:KEY LARGO MARINA, INC., Appellant, v. TRACY SABIN and ANNETTE SABIN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 18, 2001

Citations

784 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)