From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ketter v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
1:18-cv-8574 (MKV) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-8574 (MKV) (GWG)

07-07-2021

BRENDA ZIMMERMAN KETTER, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action in September 2018, alleging that the defendants are liable for injuries she suffered as the result of a medical procedure [ECF #2]. On July 1, 2021, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the action be dismissed, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute [ECF #49]. The facts and procedural history are set forth in detail in Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's R&R.

Where no timely objections are made, the Court may adopt the R&R “as long as there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Sacks v. Gandhi Eng'g, Inc., 999 F.Supp.2d 629, 632 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). Neither party filed objections to Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's R&R, and the Court agrees with his analysis. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation dated July 1, 2020 is ADOPTED in its entirety, and this case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ketter v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 7, 2021
1:18-cv-8574 (MKV) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Ketter v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA ZIMMERMAN KETTER, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-8574 (MKV) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2021)