From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenyon v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
May 16, 1896
36 A. 1132 (R.I. 1896)

Opinion

Exceptions, c., No. 1877.

May 16, 1896

INTERVENING IN SUIT; REMEDY OF CREDITOR.

Charles J. Arms, for motion.

S.W.K. Allen W.F. Angell, contra.


RESCRIPT.


The motion to take off the entry of discontinuance is denied. The mover is not a party to the suit, and, if the entry were taken off, could not be permitted to intervene in the suit and to prosecute the petition contrary to the wishes of the defendant. Cross, Petitioner, 17 R.I. 568. If he deems that his interests as a creditor of the estate have been prejudiced by the discontinuance of the petition and settlement of the suit made by the administrator, he can contest the allowance of the administrator's account in the Court of Probate.


Summaries of

Kenyon v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
May 16, 1896
36 A. 1132 (R.I. 1896)
Case details for

Kenyon v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. KENYON vs. THOMAS A. PIERCE, Adm'r

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: May 16, 1896

Citations

36 A. 1132 (R.I. 1896)
36 A. 1132