From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenyon v. Kenyon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 11, 2022
334 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-2738

03-11-2022

David Lee KENYON, Appellant, v. Marian Lynn KENYON, Appellee.

John E. Westfield and Julie K. Kurtz, of Canan Law, St. Augustine, for Appellant. Beth M. Terry, of Law Office of Beth M. Terry, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.


John E. Westfield and Julie K. Kurtz, of Canan Law, St. Augustine, for Appellant.

Beth M. Terry, of Law Office of Beth M. Terry, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

SASSO, J. David Lee Kenyon ("Former Husband") appeals the trial court's order denying modification or termination of alimony. We affirm in all respects but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. As Former Husband argued below and in his initial brief, the trial court failed to correct a scrivener's error regarding the amount of time for which Former Wife is entitled to a monetary judgment. As Former Wife concedes, the correct timeframe is ten years and eight months, rather than the eleven years and eight months as determined by the court. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter an amended order correcting this error.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

WALLIS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kenyon v. Kenyon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 11, 2022
334 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Kenyon v. Kenyon

Case Details

Full title:David Lee KENYON, Appellant, v. Marian Lynn KENYON, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

334 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)