Opinion
No. 32925
Decided February 27, 1952.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Overtime parking in metered zone — Abutting owner's rights — To ingress and egress — To loading and unloading space — Not violated, when — Delegation of power to select location of meters — Not unconstitutional, when — Parking meter ordinance not a tax law — Mayor hearing case, testifying — Not prejudicial, when — Error in trial promptly rectified — Constitutionality of parking meter ordinance questioned — Fair trial — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Uniform operation of laws — Section 26, Article II, Constitution — Police power of municipality — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hardin county.
Mr. C.A. Faulkner and Mr. Alfred F. Brindley, for appellee.
Mr. Roy Warren Roof and Mr. John L. Roof, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.