From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennis v. Vampire Weekend, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
CASE NO. 10-cv-06087-VBF-AJW (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-cv-06087-VBF-AJW State Court Case No. BC 441651

08-12-2011

ANN KIRSTEN KENNIS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC., a New York corporation; XL RECORDINGS, LTD, a United Kingdom private limited company; TOD BRODY, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC, a New York corporation; XL RECORDINGS, LTD, a United Kingdom private limited company; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Cross-Claimant, v. TOD BRODY, an individual, and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Cross-Respondents.

RICHARD L. CHARNLEY (SBN 70430) TOMAS A. BURGOS III (SBN 193434) ANNIE RIAN (SBN 260960) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY Attorneys for Defendant VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC. and XL RECORDINGS, LTD. Thomas A. Brackey Freund & Brackey LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Alan Neigher Byelas & Neigher Attorneys for Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor Law Ofcs. of A. Edward Ezor Attorneys for Plaintiff


RICHARD L. CHARNLEY (SBN 70430)

TOMAS A. BURGOS III (SBN 193434)

ANNIE RIAN (SBN 260960)

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

Attorneys for Defendant

VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC. and

XL RECORDINGS, LTD.

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF

CROSS-CLAIM, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO

F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2)

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2), Defendants and Cross-Claimants VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC. ("VWI") and XL RECORDINGS, LTD. ("XL"), hereby request a dismissal of their Cross-Claim against Defendant/Cross-Defendant TOD BRODY ("Brody"), without prejudice.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff ANN KIRSTEN KENNIS, VWI and XL have entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement") to resolve the above-captioned civil action by and between them;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, Plaintiff, VWI and XL have agreed that Plaintiff shall request a dismissal of her Complaint as to VWI, XL and Brody, with prejudice;

WHEREAS, Brody is unavailable to enter into a stipulation for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(ii);

WHEREAS, Brody has not pleaded a counterclaim in this action; and

WHEREAS Brody will not suffer any legal prejudice by the dismissal of the Cross-Claim, without prejudice;

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants VWI and XL respectfully request that the Court dismiss their Cross-Claim against Brody, without prejudice.

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN &

BENTLEY

By:TOMAS A. BURGOS III

RICHARD L. CHARNLEY

TOMAS A. BURGOS, III

ANNIE RIAN

Attorneys for Defendants/Cross

Claimants VAMPIRE WEEKEND,

INC. and XL RECORDINGS, LTD.

CASE NAME: Ann Kirsten Kennis v. Vampire Weekend, Inc., et al.

ACTION NO.: USDC Case No. 10-cv-06087 VBF AJW

PROOF OF SERVICE

METHOD OF SERVICE

[×] First Class Mail [ ] Facsimile [ ] Messenger Service
[ ] Overnight Delivery [ ] E-Mail/Electronic Delivery [ ] Hand Delivered

1. At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. My business address is 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1100, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

3. On August 12, 2011,I served the following documents:

REQUEST FOR DISMIS SAL OF CROSS-CLAIM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, etc.

I served the documents on the persons at the address below (along with their fax numbers and/or email addresses if service was by fax or email):

Thomas A. Brackey

Freund & Brackey LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Alan Neigher

Byelas & Neigher

Attorneys for Plaintiff

A. Edward Ezor

Law Ofcs. of A. Edward Ezor

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4. I served the documents by the following means:

a. [×] By United States mail: I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses specified in item 4 and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.

b. [ ] By overnight delivery: I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by an overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the addresses in item 4. I placed the envelope or package for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.

c. [ ] By messenger: I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in item 4 and providing them to a messenger for service. (Separate declaration of personal service to be provided by the messenger.)

d. [ ] By fax transmission: Based on an agreement between the parties and in conformance with Rule 2.306, and/or as a courtesy, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed in item 4. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission is attached.

e. [ ] By email or electronic transmission: Based on an agreement between the parties and/or as a courtesy, I sent the documents to the persons at the email addresses listed in item 4. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.

[ ] I served by hand the documents described herein on the person(s) listed in Item 4 of this Proof of Service.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Arnette M. Ames

Print Name

Signature


Summaries of

Kennis v. Vampire Weekend, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
CASE NO. 10-cv-06087-VBF-AJW (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Kennis v. Vampire Weekend, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANN KIRSTEN KENNIS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. VAMPIRE WEEKEND, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10-cv-06087-VBF-AJW (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)