From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 13, 2015
2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2015)

Opinion


JERRY NOBLE KENNEDY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. No. 2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP United States District Court, E.D. California. May 13, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Pursuant to the court's February 13, 2015 order, the parties filed a joint statement explaining the exhaustion status of the claims in the petition and proposing a briefing schedule for petitioner's motion to stay/abey these proceedings pending exhaustion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The parties agree the following claims in the petition filed here on January 12, 2015, are unexhausted and this court finds they are: Claim VI, subclaim (a); Claim VI, subclaim (b)(2); Claim VII, subclaim (a); Claim VII, subclaim (b)(1); Claim XI, subclaim (a); Claim XII; and Claim XIII.

2. Within 45 days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file any motion for stay and abeyance of these proceedings pending exhaustion. Within 30 days of petitioner's filing, respondent shall file a response. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 13, 2015
2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

Case Details

Full title:JERRY NOBLE KENNEDY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2015)