From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Kings Mosquito Abatement Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2013
1:12-cv-1458 AWI MJS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-1458 AWI MJS

01-02-2013

JOSEPH KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. KINGS MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT; MICHAEL CAVANAGH, an individual; STEVE GILLES, an individual; DAVID HICKEY, an individual; and DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF JANUARY 7, 2013, AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

In this action for damages, defendants Kings Mosquito Abatement District, and individual defendants Michael Cavanagh, Steve Gilles and David Hickey, (collectively, "Defendants"), have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the complaint of plaintiff Joseph Kennedy ("Plaintiff"). The matter was scheduled for oral argument to be held on January 7, 2013. The court has reviewed Defendants' motion, Plaintiff's opposition and Defendants' replies and the applicable law and has determined that Defendant's motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of January 7, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of January 7, 2013, the court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter render a decision. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Kings Mosquito Abatement Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2013
1:12-cv-1458 AWI MJS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Kings Mosquito Abatement Dist.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. KINGS MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT; MICHAEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-1458 AWI MJS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)