From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 1986
715 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

85-T-21; A36288

Submitted on record and briefs February 27, 1986.

Reversed April 2, 1986.

Judicial Review from Employment Division.

George W. McKallip, Jr. and Kennedy, King Zimmer, Portland, filed the brief for petitioner.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Petitioner, a partnership of lawyers, seeks judicial review of the referee's decision holding that it is not entitled to succeed to the experience rating of its predecessor partnership after one of the partners withdrew from the partnership. The Employment Division concedes that petitioner is the successor in interest and that the referee's decision should be reversed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 2, 1986
715 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division

Case Details

Full title:KENNEDY, KING ZIMMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 2, 1986

Citations

715 P.2d 1129 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
715 P.2d 1129

Citing Cases

Joseph, Babener & Carpenter v. Employment Division

The court rejected RSMJ's contention that such a change had occurred and held that the successor took the…