From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrid v. Marzan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 20, 2023
2:22-cv-2301 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-2301 KJN P

03-20-2023

FORREST KENDRID, Plaintiff, v. MARZAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By an order filed February 13, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the court's filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not complied with or responded to the court's order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Kendrid v. Marzan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 20, 2023
2:22-cv-2301 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Kendrid v. Marzan

Case Details

Full title:FORREST KENDRID, Plaintiff, v. MARZAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-2301 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2023)