Opinion
No. 09-06-413 CR
Submitted on May 29, 2007.
Opinion Delivered June 20, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 89698.
Before MCKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Lewis Kendrick pled guilty to burglary of a habitation. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Kendrick guilty, but deferred further proceedings and placed Kendrick on community supervision for five years. On November 30, 2005, the State filed a motion to revoke Kendrick's unadjudicated community supervision. Kendrick pled "true" to three violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Kendrick violated the conditions of his community supervision, found him guilty of burglary of a habitation, and assessed punishment at eleven years of confinement. Kendrick's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). On February 8, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. AFFIRMED.
Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.