From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrick v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 8, 2010
CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-522-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-522-T-17-EAJ.

March 8, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R R) issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on February 18, 2010 (Docket No. 17). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's claims for a period of disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income.

Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Nettles v. Wainwright , 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc). Timely objections to the report and recommendation were filed (Docket No. 18).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia , 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc. , 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation, February 3, 2010 (Docket No. 17) be adopted and incorporated by reference; the objections are overruled; and the Court affirms the decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's claims for a period of disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for the defendant and against the plaintiff, to close the case and terminate any pending motions. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Kendrick v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 8, 2010
CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-522-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Kendrick v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LAURA KENDRICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-522-T-17-EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Witherell v. Berryhill

The fact that the ALJ's decision does not indicate that she considered the import of certain examination…

Nowaczyk v. Kijakazi

The 18 trigger points associated with fibromyalgia are located across the neck, shoulders, chest, upper back,…