From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendle v. Amsterdam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 2007
8 N.Y.3d 940 (N.Y. 2007)

Opinion

No. 233.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

Decided April 26, 2007.

Reported below, 36 AD3d 985.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order where the appeal to the Appellate Division was from a County Court order entered on an appeal in this action commenced in the City Court of the City of Amsterdam ( see NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [ 7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).


Summaries of

Kendle v. Amsterdam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 2007
8 N.Y.3d 940 (N.Y. 2007)
Case details for

Kendle v. Amsterdam

Case Details

Full title:DUANE C. KENDLE, Appellant, v. TOWN OF AMSTERDAM et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 2007

Citations

8 N.Y.3d 940 (N.Y. 2007)
834 N.Y.S.2d 714

Citing Cases

Burkins & Foley Trucking & Storage, Inc. v. Cnty. of Albany

We affirm. Unless a land sale contract expressly provides otherwise, a vendor bears the risk of loss until…