From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 1997
236 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 7, 1997.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for leave to file and serve an amended complaint alleging a cause of action to foreclose a mechanic's lien ( see, Hempstead Concrete Corp. v Elite Assocs., 203 AD2d 521). Leave to amend a pleading shall be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]; Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934), and defendant will not suffer any surprise or prejudice by the amendment ( see, Ross v Markham, 175 AD2d 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J. — Amend Complaint.)


Summaries of

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 1997
236 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:KEN KINSEY, INC., Appellant, v. ANDREA ROBINSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 701

Citing Cases

ARG Trucking Corp. v. Amerimart Development Co.

Because the record does not contain any evidence that plaintiff extinguished the rights of those potential…