From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
1:12-cv-00003-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-cv-00003-JMM-JTK

11-28-2012

MARVIN KEMP PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 48) within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond may result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2012.

_____________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kemp v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2012
1:12-cv-00003-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Kemp v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN KEMP PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

1:12-cv-00003-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 28, 2012)