From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Summary

In Kelly v. State, 28 A.D.2d 1177, 284 N.Y.S.2d 548 (Sup. Ct. App. Div. 1967), a farm was condemned which had a large gravel deposit close to the dwelling house.

Summary of this case from Green Mt. Marble Co. v. Highway Bd.

Opinion

November 17, 1967


Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding claimants $171,877 for an appropriation of some 41 acres located in southern Dutchess County for highway purposes. Prior to the appropriation claimants owned a total of over 350 acres on which were located some 16 structures, including two residences and several farm buildings. The property was concededly well developed and maintained and the trial court's finding of the highest and best use as an estate farm is well supported. The evidence amply indicates the property was ideally suited for this purpose and that if it were offered for sale as a whole might well have been purchased for such a continued use. The fact that there have been no recent comparable sales clearly does not indicate that there would be no market for the instant property as an estate farm in this particular area where the evidence is that only a minimum amount of property so suited still existed and none of that was available for sale. Furthermore, considering the effect the appropriation had on the property, particularly on the farming operation conducted thereon, and the difficult valuation problem faced by the court in this case, the trial court's assessment of damages constituted just compensation except for its award with respect to the gravel deposit located on the premises. While valuable mineral deposits on condemned land constitute an element of damages to be considered ( Berzal Co. v. State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 886), an award based on such a theory is inconsistent with the use attributed to the property here and the location of the gravel mound in close proximity to the principal dwelling house on the estate farm. Accordingly, a value of $800 per acre, the figure used for the surrounding acreage, should be substituted for the $3,000 per acre utilized by the court in valuing the eight acres comprising the gravel mound and the award therefore reduced by $17,600. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, so as to reduce the award to $154,177 and appropriate interest, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J.P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.


Summaries of

Kelly v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

In Kelly v. State, 28 A.D.2d 1177, 284 N.Y.S.2d 548 (Sup. Ct. App. Div. 1967), a farm was condemned which had a large gravel deposit close to the dwelling house.

Summary of this case from Green Mt. Marble Co. v. Highway Bd.
Case details for

Kelly v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN A. KELLY et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Green Mt. Marble Co. v. Highway Bd.

It is to be noted that this is not the first time a court has valued lands over a mineral deposit based upon…

Dauernheim, Inc. v. State

We would note that the existence or non-existence of comparable sales has no conclusive bearing on such a…